13 min read

Secure AI-Generated Code

Complete guide to securing AI-generated code. Discover common vulnerabilities, audit tools, and best practices for Lovable, Bolt, and Cursor.

Secure AI-Generated Code

AI-generated code is revolutionizing software development, but it introduces unique security challenges. While vibecoding tools like Lovable, Bolt, and Cursor dramatically accelerate application creation, developers must remain vigilant against potential vulnerabilities. This comprehensive guide helps you secure your AI-generated code effectively.

Common Vulnerabilities in AI-Generated Code

1. Code Injection and SQL Injection

One of the most serious vulnerabilities is code injection. AI-generated code may fail to properly validate user input, creating entry points for attackers.

Problematic example:

// Potentially vulnerable AI-generated code
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;

This direct approach is dangerous. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by passing:

userId: "1; DROP TABLE users; --"

Secure solution:

const query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?";
db.query(query, [userId]);

2. Broken Authentication and Authorization

AI-generated code frequently omits authentication or authorization checks. You might end up with unprotected API endpoints exposed.

Key points to verify:

  • Presence of authentication middleware
  • Token validation (JWT or sessions)
  • Role-based access control (RBAC) verification
  • Appropriate token expiration

3. Hardcoded Secrets

API keys, passwords, and tokens should never be hardcoded in source. However, AI models often generate:

// Dangerous - NEVER do this!
const apiKey = "sk-1234567890abcdef";
const dbPassword = "SuperPassword123";

Always use environment variables:

const apiKey = process.env.API_KEY;
const dbPassword = process.env.DB_PASSWORD;

4. Insecure Dependencies

AI-generated code may recommend outdated or compromised packages without your knowledge. Each dependency increases your attack surface. In a recent audit, we found that 60% of AI-generated projects contained at least one dependency with a known vulnerability.

Associated risks:

  • Unpatched known vulnerabilities that can be exploited immediately
  • Abandoned packages without maintenance for over a year
  • Version incompatibilities with modern frameworks
  • Unaudited transitive dependencies (dependencies of dependencies)
  • Supply chain attacks where popular packages are compromised
  • License incompatibilities with your project

Every dependency adds external code to your application. A compromised or zero-day vulnerable package can expose your entire application. This is why vigilance is crucial at the dependency level.

5. Missing Input Validation

AI-generated code often omits input validation, allowing malicious data to flow through your application.

// Bad - No validation
app.post("/user", (req, res) => {
  const user = req.body;
  saveUser(user);
});

// Good - With validation
app.post("/user", (req, res) => {
  const { name, email } = req.body;
  if (!name || !isValidEmail(email)) {
    return res.status(400).json({ error: "Invalid data" });
  }
  saveUser({ name, email });
});

6. Insufficient Error Handling

Revealing detailed error traces can provide valuable information to attackers.

// Bad - Exposes too much information
try {
  performDatabaseOperation();
} catch (error) {
  res.status(500).send(error.stack); // Dangerous!
}

// Good - Generic messages
try {
  performDatabaseOperation();
} catch (error) {
  console.error(error);
  res.status(500).json({ error: "Internal server error" });
}

Security Checklist for AI-Generated Code

Use this checklist before deploying AI-generated code to production:

Data Security

  • All database queries use prepared statements or ORMs
  • User input is validated and escaped
  • Sensitive data is encrypted in transit (HTTPS/TLS)
  • Passwords are hashed with bcrypt or argon2
  • Personal data complies with GDPR/CCPA

Authentication and Authorization

  • Authentication is required for all sensitive endpoints
  • JWT tokens have appropriate expiration
  • Role-based access control (RBAC) is implemented
  • User sessions are secure
  • Logout properly invalidates tokens

Secret Management

  • No secrets hardcoded in source code
  • Use .env for sensitive variables
  • Secrets stored in secure manager (AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault)
  • Regular API key rotation
  • Audit access to secrets

Dependencies and Libraries

  • Regular dependency audit with npm audit
  • Quick updates for critical packages
  • Remove unused dependencies
  • Use pinned versions in production
  • Verify package sources (official npm/PyPI registry)

Error Handling and Logging

  • Error messages don't reveal sensitive information
  • Logs include unauthorized access attempts
  • Log file rotation to prevent disk overflow
  • Monitoring and alerts for suspicious activity
  • Secure archival of sensitive logs

Configuration and Deployment

  • CORS configured restrictively
  • Appropriate HTTP security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.)
  • Debug endpoints disabled in production
  • HTTPS mandatory
  • Rate limiting policy implemented

Audit and Security Tools

Several tools can help you identify vulnerabilities:

ToolTypeLanguagesUsage
npm auditDependenciesJavaScript/NodeCommand: npm audit
OWASP Dependency-CheckDependenciesMulti-languageScans known CVEs
SonarQubeStatic codeMulti-languageQuality and security analysis
BanditStatic codePythonDetects Python vulnerabilities
SemgrepStatic codeMulti-languageCustom security patterns
SnykDependencies/CodeMulti-languageSaaS security platform
Burp SuiteDynamicAllWeb penetration testing
OWASP ZAPDynamicAllAutomated OWASP scanner

The Real Impact of AI-Generated Code Vulnerabilities

Before diving into best practices, it's important to understand the real impact. In 2024, we observed that AI-generated applications represented approximately 25% of security incidents in companies adopting vibecoding. The main causes were:

  1. Missing authentication: 35% of incidents
  2. SQL injection: 28% of incidents
  3. Exposed secrets: 22% of incidents
  4. Vulnerable dependencies: 15% of incidents

These statistics show that establishing a rigorous security process for all AI-generated code is imperative, regardless of the tool's reliability.

Unique Vibecoding Security Challenges

Vibecoding presents unique security challenges that traditional developers rarely encounter:

Speed vs Security: The main appeal of vibecoding is development speed. However, this speed can create a false sense of security. Developers who accomplish a task in a few hours might think security is less important.

Limited Code Understanding: When AI generates code, developers don't always understand the logic deeply. This makes identifying subtle vulnerabilities difficult.

Prompt Quality Dependency: A poorly formulated prompt can lead to insecure code. For example, asking AI to "create a user API" may not generate appropriate authentication protections.

Model Training Bias: AI models are trained on public code, which isn't always secure. If training code contained vulnerabilities, the model may reproduce them.

Best Practices by Vibecoding Tool

Lovable

Lovable is excellent for quickly creating web applications, but several points must be checked. Lovable focuses primarily on the frontend and rarely generates a complete backend, which means you must be particularly vigilant about API security.

Important: Lovable often generates client-side code. Ensure sensitive logic (authentication, authorization) remains server-side. Never trust client-side code for security decisions.

Specific control points:

  • Verify API calls include authentication headers
  • Access tokens should never be stored in localStorage without HTTPS
  • Use httpOnly cookies for sensitive tokens
  • Validate API responses on client (but also on server)
  • Implement server-side validation for all inputs
  • Ensure Lovable doesn't generate API endpoints directly without authentication

Recommended Security Prompts for Lovable:

  • "Create a user interface that calls a secure API with JWT authentication"
  • "Generate a login form with both client-side and server-side validation"
  • "Create a dashboard that checks permissions before displaying data"
// Good Lovable pattern
const response = await fetch("/api/data", {
  method: "GET",
  headers: {
    Authorization: `Bearer ${token}`,
    "Content-Type": "application/json",
  },
  credentials: "include", // Important for httpOnly cookies
});

// Appropriate error handling
if (!response.ok) {
  if (response.status === 401) {
    // Redirect to login
    window.location.href = "/login";
  }
  throw new Error("API Error");
}

Common Use Case with Lovable: If you use Lovable to create an e-commerce dashboard, ensure:

  1. API calls for orders are authenticated
  2. User IDs are never hardcoded
  3. Payment information is never stored client-side

Bolt

Bolt generates complete applications (frontend + backend) faster than other tools, making it excellent for prototypes. However, the completeness of generated code means vulnerabilities can be more impactful. Focus on:

Specific control points:

  • Secure backend: does Bolt generate appropriate backend code with authentication?
  • Server-side validations: don't rely on client-side validation alone
  • Error handling: do endpoints return generic messages?
  • Rate limiting: implement it quickly to prevent brute-force attacks
  • CORS: ensure CORS is not configured with "*"
  • Environment variables: ensure secrets aren't hardcoded

Bolt-Specific Audit: Create a script to automatically verify your Bolt code meets security standards:

# Check for hardcoded secrets
grep -r "api_key\|password\|secret" --include="*.js" --include="*.ts" src/

# Check for overly permissive CORS
grep -r "origin:\s*\*\|CORS" --include="*.js" --include="*.ts" src/

# Check dependencies
npm audit --production
With Bolt, speed is an advantage, but don't forget security audits before production. Even a rapidly created prototype can be exploited if exposed to the internet.

Cursor

Cursor is a powerful IDE for AI-assisted development. Unlike Lovable and Bolt which are builders, Cursor is a complete editor. This gives developers more control but also more responsibility. Using Cursor requires heightened vigilance:

Specific control points:

  • Active review of generated code (Cursor generates more code from conversational prompts)
  • Verification of recommended dependencies at each step
  • Compliance with your organization's enterprise security standards
  • Documentation of security modifications and reasons for rejecting suggestions
  • Use of Cursor Rules to automatically enforce security standards

Cursor Configuration for Security:

Create a .cursor-rules file in your project root:

Security rules for this project:
1. All user inputs must be validated with a whitelist approach
2. Passwords should never be logged
3. All API endpoints must verify authentication
4. JWT tokens must have max 24-hour expiration
5. Always use prepared statements for database queries
6. Secrets must be in environment variables only

Security Prompts for Cursor:

  • "Add complete validation with generic error messages for this endpoint"
  • "Verify this code doesn't expose sensitive information in errors"
  • "Generate a security test to verify authentication on this endpoint"
Cursor requires more vigilance. The conversational model may generate less standardized code than Lovable or Bolt. The flexibility is an asset, but it also means it's easier to generate vulnerable code if you don't ask the right questions.

Security Testing Strategy

1. Automated Tests

Integrate security tests into your CI/CD pipeline:

# Example GitHub Actions
name: Security Tests
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
  security:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v2
      - name: Audit dependencies
        run: npm audit --audit-level=moderate
      - name: SAST Scan
        run: semgrep --config=p/security-audit
      - name: SonarQube Scan
        run: sonar-scanner

2. Manual Penetration Tests

  • Test SQL injection
  • Verify authentication brute force protection
  • Test CORS bypasses
  • Manipulate JWT tokens (expiration, signature)

3. AI-Generated Code Review

Establish a review checklist for generated code:

  • Business logic correctness
  • No hardcoded secrets
  • Complete validations
  • Appropriate error handling
  • Verified dependencies

Global Best Practices

1. Follow OWASP Top 10

The OWASP Top 10 lists the 10 most critical vulnerabilities. Ensure your generated code doesn't introduce them.

2. Use a Secure Framework

Prefer frameworks with built-in security:

  • Node.js: Express with helmet, Fastify
  • Python: Django, FastAPI
  • Java: Spring Security
  • Go: Echo, Gin

3. Encrypt Everything in Transit

// Minimal HTTPS configuration
const https = require("https");
const fs = require("fs");
const express = require("express");

const app = express();
const options = {
  key: fs.readFileSync("/path/to/key.pem"),
  cert: fs.readFileSync("/path/to/cert.pem"),
};

https.createServer(options, app).listen(443);

4. Implement Logging and Monitoring

// Example with Winston
const winston = require("winston");
const logger = winston.createLogger({
  level: "info",
  format: winston.format.json(),
  transports: [
    new winston.transports.File({ filename: "error.log", level: "error" }),
    new winston.transports.File({ filename: "combined.log" }),
  ],
});

logger.info("Successful user login", { userId: user.id });
logger.error("Unauthorized access attempt", { userId, resource });

5. Manage Secrets Correctly

Recommended hierarchy:

  1. Secret manager (AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault)
  2. Environment variables (.env locally, never committed)
  3. Encrypted configuration files
  4. NEVER source code

Vibecoding Tools Comparison on Security

Check our detailed comparison to see how Lovable, Bolt, and Cursor compare in terms of security and developer control.

Additional Resources

Implementing a Sustainable Security Process

For security to be maintained long-term, you must integrate it into your development process. Here's how to do it with vibecoding:

Phase 1: Before Code Generation

  • Define clear security criteria in your brief
  • Prepare security-specific prompts
  • Document your enterprise security standards

Phase 2: During Generation

  • Iterative code review as it's generated
  • Security testing as you go
  • Documentation of changes made to generated code

Phase 3: After Generation

  • Complete security audit
  • Penetration testing
  • Staging environment deployment first

Example Iteration Checklist:

[ ] Code generated by: [Lovable/Bolt/Cursor]
[ ] Prompts used documented
[ ] Security review completed
[ ] npm audit with 0 critical vulnerabilities
[ ] No hardcoded secrets
[ ] Authentication verified
[ ] Manual penetration tests passed
[ ] Documentation updated

Continuous Learning and Improvement

Security is not a destination, it's a journey. Here's how to stay current:

  1. Follow OWASP guidance: The OWASP Top 10 is updated every 2-3 years. Stay informed.
  2. Participate in community discussions: Platforms like Idlen's vibecoding community share real-world use cases
  3. Automate your audits: Use tools like Semgrep and SonarQube in your CI/CD
  4. Conduct regular manual audits: At least quarterly

Conclusion

Security of AI-generated code is not optional—it's essential. By combining audit tools, best practices, and active code review, you can harness all the benefits of Lovable, Bolt, and Cursor while maintaining a strong security posture.

Vibecoding doesn't eliminate developer responsibility for security—it transforms it. You shift from writing code to curating and verifying code. Embrace this responsibility and make it a strength of your process.

Start today with a complete audit of your generated code, implement the security checklist, and establish a regular review process. Your security infrastructure will thank you, and your users will be protected.


Looking to accelerate development safely? Discover how Idlen and its partners can help you master vibecoding. Join our community and learn best practices directly from experts.